Acting Director Appointed to U.S. FTC BCP


Thomas Pahl has been appointed Acting Director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, according to a press release on the FTC’s website. “Pahl previously served a detail to the United States Senate Judiciary Committee under the leadership of Chairman Orrin Hatch, focusing on antitrust and consumer privacy issues. Pahl also has worked…

GOP Lawmakers Introduce Companion Bills to Eliminate CFPB


Yesterday Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) each introduced legislation to eliminate the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The Hill reported. “Cruz said in a statement his bill ‘’gives Congress the opportunity to free consumers and small businesses from the CFPB’s regulatory blockades and financial activism, which stunt economic growth.’” However, a recent memo…

CFPB on its Own


The U.S. Court of Appeals denied requests by Democratic lawmakers and consumer groups to intervene in the PHH Corp. v CFPB case that could determine the fate of its director, American Banker reported. “The same panel ruled in October that the CFPB’s single-director structure was unconstitutional. … If the D.C. Circuit denies the CFPB’s appeal,…

U.K. style bank regulation for U.S.?


U.S. banks could be headed toward U.K.-style regulation under the Trump administration according to recent written responses by Treasury Secretary nominee Steve Mnuchin, the New York Times reported. “In his written comments, Mr. Mnuchin said that ‘a bright line between commercial and investment banking…may inhibit the necessary lending and capital markets activities to support a…

UPDATED: Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens, could nix EU-US data flows | TechCrunch


https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/26/trump-order-strips-privacy-rights-from-non-u-s-citizens-could-nix-eu-us-data-flows/?ncid=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&utm_content=Netvibes   UPDATE: 26 January 2017 13:47 PT As pointed out by someone slightly smarter than me, this order should be read in the context of the Judicial Redress Act of 2015. Regardless, Privacy Shield has not been popular. Those against it will use this order for all its worth, and then some.